Student access to and skills in using technology in an open and distance learning context

Authors

  • Hanlie Liebenberg University of South Africa
  • Yuraisha Chetty Institutional Research, Unisa
  • Paul Prinsloo Institute for Open and Distance Learning, Unisa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1303

Keywords:

Access, digital divide, ICT, open distance learning (ODL), skills, University of South Africa (Unisa)

Abstract

Amidst the different challenges facing higher education, and particularly distance education (DE) and open distance learning (ODL), access to information and communication technology (ICT) and students’ abilities to use ICTs are highly contested issues in the South African higher education landscape. While there are various opinions about the scope and definition of the digital divide, increasing empirical evidence questions the uncritical use of the notion of the digital divide in South African and international higher education discourses.

In the context of the University of South Africa (Unisa) as a mega ODL institution, students’ access to technology and their functional competence are some of the critical issues to consider as Unisa prepares our graduates for an increasingly digital and networked world.

This paper discusses a descriptive study that investigated students’ access to technology and their capabilities in using technology, within the broader discourse of the “digital divide.” Results support literature that challenges a simplistic understanding of the notion of the “digital divide” and reveal that the nature of access is varied.

Author Biography

Hanlie Liebenberg, University of South Africa

Institutional Research, Unisa

Published

2012-10-26

How to Cite

Liebenberg, H., Chetty, Y., & Prinsloo, P. (2012). Student access to and skills in using technology in an open and distance learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(4), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1303

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
3
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
110
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press