Mentoring Graduate Students Online: Strategies and Challenges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5093Keywords:
e-mentoring, online mentoring, virtual mentoring, graduate mentoringAbstract
The proliferation of online graduate programs, and more recently, higher education institutions’ moves to online interactions due to the COVID-19 crisis, have led to graduate student mentoring increasingly occurring online. Challenges, strategies, and outcomes associated with online mentoring of graduate students are of primary importance for the individuals within a mentoring dyad and for universities offering online or blended graduate education. The nature of mentoring interactions within an online format presents unique challenges and thus requires strategies specifically adapted to such interactions. There is a need to examine how mentoring relationships have been, and can best be, conducted when little to no face-to-face interaction occurs. This paper undertook a literature review of empirical studies from the last two decades on online master’s and doctoral student mentoring. The main themes were challenges, strategies and best practices, and factors that influence the online mentoring relationship. The findings emphasized the importance of fostering interpersonal aspects of the mentoring relationship, ensuring clarity of expectations and communications as well as competence with technologies, providing access to peer mentor groups or cohorts, and institutional support for online faculty mentors. Within these online mentoring relationships, the faculty member becomes the link to an otherwise absent yet critical experience of academia for the online student, making it imperative to create and foster an effective relationship based on identified strategies and best practices for online mentoring.
References
Ambrose, A. G., & Williamson Ambrose, L. (2013). The blended advising model: Transforming advising with eportfolios. International Journal of ePortfolio, 3(1), 75–89. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107822
An, S., & Lipscomb, R. (2013). Instant mentoring: Sharing wisdom and getting advice online with e-mentoring. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113(5), S32–S37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2010.06.019
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing environment. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/725
Andrew, M. (2012). Supervising doctorates at a distance: Three trans-Tasman stories. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881211198239
Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-008-9084-x
Bender, S., Rubel, D. J., & Dykeman, C. (2018). An interpretive phenomenological analysis of doctoral counselor education students’ experience of receiving cybersupervision. Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 11(1). https://repository.wcsu.edu/jcps/vol11/iss1/7
Berg, G. (2016). The dissertation process and mentor relationships for African American and Latina/o students in an online program. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(4), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1227191
Bierema, L. L., & Merriam, S. B. (2002). E-mentoring: Using computer mediated communication to enhance the mentoring process. Innovative Higher Education, 26(3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017921023103
Broome, M. E., Halstead, J. A., Pesut, D. J., Rawl, S. M., & Boland, D. L. (2011). Evaluating the outcomes of a distance-accessible PhD program. Journal of Professional Nursing, 27(2), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.09.011
Byrnes, D., Uribe-Flórez, L. J., Trespalacios, J., & Chilson, J. (2019). Doctoral e-mentoring: Current practices and effective strategies. Online Learning Journal, 23(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1446
Columbaro, N. L. (2009). e-Mentoring possibilities for online doctoral students: A literature review. Adult Learning, 20(3–4), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/104515950902000305
Crawford, L. M., Randolph, J. J., & Yob, I. M. (2014). Theoretical development, factorial validity, and reliability of the online graduate mentoring scale. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 22(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2014.882603
de Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843984
de Janasz, S. C., & Godshalk, V. M. (2013). The role of e-mentoring in protégés’ learning and satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 743–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601113511296
Deshpande, A. (2016). A qualitative examination of challenges influencing doctoral students in an online doctoral program. International Education Studies, 9(6), 139. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1103528
Deshpande, A. (2017). Faculty best practices to support students in the ‘virtual doctoral land.’ Higher Education for the Future, 4(1), 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631116681211
Doyle, N., Jacobs, K., & Ryan, C. (2016). Faculty mentors’ perspectives on e-mentoring post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy International, 23(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.1431
Duffy, J., Wickersham-Fish, L., Rademaker, L., & Wetzler, E. (2018). Using collaborative autoethnography to explore online doctoral mentoring: Finding empathy in mentor/protégé relationships. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 2(1), 57–76. http://www.ejecs.org/index.php/AJQR/article/view/161
Erichsen, E., Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2014). Student satisfaction with graduate supervision in doctoral programs primarily delivered in distance education settings. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.709496
Ghani, F. (2020). Remote teaching and supervision of graduate scholars in the unprecedented and testing times. Journal of the Pakistan Dental Association, 29(Suppl. 2020), S36–S42. https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.29S.S36
Griffiths, M., & Miller, H. (2005). E-mentoring: Does it have a place in medicine? Postgraduate Medical Journal, 81(956), 389–390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2004.029702
Jacobs, K., Doyle, N., & Ryan, C. (2015). The nature, perception, and impact of e-mentoring on post-professional occupational therapy doctoral students. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 29(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2015.1006752
Jameson, C., & Torres, K. (2019). Fostering motivation when virtually mentoring online doctoral students. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 9(1), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2019.09.1.23
Khan, R., & Gogos, A. (2013). Online mentoring for biotechnology graduate students: An industry-academia partnership. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 89–107. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1011366
Kumar, S., & Coe, C. (2017). Mentoring and student support in online doctoral programs. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2017.1300464
Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2017). Mentoring doctoral students online: Mentor strategies and challenges. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 25(2), 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2017.1326693
Kumar, S., & Johnson, M. (2019). Online mentoring of dissertations: the role of structure and support. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1337736.
Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. International Journal of E-Learning &Distance Education, 27(1). http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/835
Lechuga, V. M. (2011). Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62(6), 757-771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9416-0
Nasiri, F., & Mafakheri, F. (2015). Postgraduate research supervision at a distance: A review of challenges and strategies. Studies in Higher Education, 40(10), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.914906
Pardo, J. C., Ramon, D., Stefanelli-Silva, G., Elegbede, I., Lima, L. S., & Principe, S. C. (2020). Advancing through the pandemic from the perspective of marine graduate researchers: Challenges, solutions, and opportunities. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 528. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00528
Rademaker, L. L., Duffy, J. O. C., Wetzler, E., & Zaikina-Montgomery, H. (2016). Chair perceptions of trust between mentor and mentee in online doctoral dissertation mentoring. Online Learning Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v20i1.605
Ross, J., & Sheail, P. (2017). The ‘campus imaginary’: Online students’ experience of the masters dissertation at a distance. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(7), 839–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1319809
Roumell, E. A. L., & Bolliger, D. U. (2017). Experiences of faculty with doctoral student supervision in programs delivered via distance. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 65(2), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2017.1320179
Schichtel, M. (2010). Core-competence skills in e-mentoring for medical educators: A conceptual exploration. Medical Teacher, 32(7), e248–e262. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.489126
Schroeder, S. M., & Terras, K. L. (2015). Advising experiences and needs of online, cohort, and classroom adult graduate learners. NACADA Journal, 35(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-13-044
Stein, D., & Glazer, H. R. (2003). Mentoring the adult learner in academic midlife at a distance education university. American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_2
Suciati. (2011). Student preferences and experiences in online thesis advising: A case study of Universitas Terbuka. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(3), 215–228. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ965078
Sussex, R. (2008). Technological options in supervising remote research students. Higher Education, 55(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-006-9038-0
Welch, S. (2017). Virtual mentoring program within an online doctoral nursing education program: A phenomenological study. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnes-2016-0049
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
