Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application

Authors

  • Weiyuan Zhang School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong
  • Yau Ling Cheng School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1181

Keywords:

e-learning, online learning, quality assurance, evaluation

Abstract

E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of e-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of e-learning courses. This paper constructs a four-phase evaluation model for e-learning courses, which includes planning, development, process, and product evaluation, called the PDPP evaluation model. Planning evaluation includes market demand, feasibility, target student group, course objectives, and finance. Development evaluation includes instructional design, course material design, course Web site design, flexibility, student-student interaction, teacher/tutor support, technical support, and assessment. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. Using the PDPP model as a research framework, a purely e-learning course on Research Methods in Distance Education, developed by the School of Professional and Continuing Education at the University of Hong Kong (HKU SPACE) and jointly offered with the School of Distance Learning for Medical Education of Peking University (SDLME, PKU) was used as a case study. Sixty students from mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau, and Malaysia were recruited for this course. According to summative evaluation through a student e-learning experience survey, the majority of students were very satisfied/satisfied on all e-learning dimensions of this course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, student-centred learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic PDPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the PDPP evaluation model and its application can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider e-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.

Author Biographies

Weiyuan Zhang, School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong

Dr. Zhang Weiyuan is the Head and Chief Researcher of the Centre for Research in Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, and Head of the Centre for Cyber Learning, School of Professional and Continuing Education, the University of Hong Kong. He is also the Chief Editor of the International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, Adjunct Professor at the Beijing Normal University, Advisory Professor at East China Normal University, and Visiting Professor at Open University of China, Beijing Open University, Shanghai Open University, Jiangsu Open University, Guangzhou University, and Capital Normal University.

Yau Ling Cheng, School of Professional and Continuing Education, The University of Hong Kong

Ms. Yau Ling Cheng is the Deputy Director, Head of College of Humanities and Law, and Head of College of Life Sciences and Technology, School of Professional and Continuing Education, the University of Hong Kong.

Published

2012-04-26

How to Cite

Zhang, W., & Cheng, Y. L. (2012). Quality assurance in e-learning: PDPP evaluation model and its application. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i3.1181

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
114
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press