Challenges for successful planning of open and distance learning (ODL): A template analysis

Authors

  • Ansie Minnaar University of South Africa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1387

Keywords:

Template analysis, challenges in open and distance learning, distance education.

Abstract

How to plan an open and distance learning (ODL) unit in higher education is not clearly described in the literature. A number of ODL facilities at residential universities have not been successful because of a lack of planning or because of failure to ensure that all the different systems for ODL delivery were in place and functioning. This paper sheds light on how to plan strategically and how to implement an ODL unit at an existing university.

A template analysis was used to construct a road map for ODL planners. We used this analytical tool to organise data from a large collection of articles, books, and documents from 1980-2010. We purposefully chose template analysis as a document analysis process to foster the recurring themes found in published articles on planning and implementing ODL facilities in higher education.

The results indicate four main strategies for successful implementation of an ODL unit. The template consists of strategic planning, policies, systems, and challenges. It was concluded that the template for ODL planning offers new insight into distance education. It could be used as a foundation for ODL planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. We recommend further research on the template with the aim of theory construction for ODL planning and implementation.

Author Biography

Ansie Minnaar, University of South Africa

Professor at Institute for Open and Distance Learning, UNISA

Published

2013-07-05

How to Cite

Minnaar, A. (2013). Challenges for successful planning of open and distance learning (ODL): A template analysis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(3), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i3.1387

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
254
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press