Online Instructors’ Use of Scaffolding Strategies to Promote Interactions: A Scale Development Study

Authors

  • Moon-Heum Cho Sungkyunkwan University
  • YoonJung Cho Sungshin Women's University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2816

Keywords:

instructor scaffolding, online interaction, social interaction, instructor social presence, student social presence, perceived learning

Abstract

A great deal of research has documented that interactions among students or between students and instructors are key to student success in an online learning setting. However, very little research has been statistically and systematically conducted to examine online instructors’ conscious and effortful use of scaffolding strategies to promote interactions in online courses. The purpose of this research was to develop a scale assessing online instructors’ use of scaffolding strategies to promote interactions. We employed a scale development method for the study. Exploratory factor analysis revealed one factor structure associated with instructors’ use of scaffolding strategies to promote interactions in online settings. Confirmatory factor analysis conducted with a different group of online students indicated that the one-factor model fits the data well. In addition, significant correlations with social presence and classroom learning community scales further demonstrated convergent validity. The new scale of online instructors’ use of scaffolding strategies to promote interactions demonstrated psychometrically sound validity and reliability.

Author Biography

Moon-Heum Cho, Sungkyunkwan University

Associate Professor, Department of Education, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul S. Korea

 

Published

2016-12-06

How to Cite

Cho, M.-H., & Cho, Y. (2016). Online Instructors’ Use of Scaffolding Strategies to Promote Interactions: A Scale Development Study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2816

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
185
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press