Open Assessment of Learning: A Meta-Synthesis

Authors

  • Andres Chiappe Universidad de La Sabana
  • Ricardo Alfonso Pinto Universidad Piloto de Colombia
  • Vivian Arias Universidad de la Sabana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2846

Keywords:

learning assessment, collaboration, open educational practice, educational technology, peer assessment

Abstract

Open Assessment of Learning (OAoL) is an emerging educational concept derived from the incorporation of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) to education and is related with the Open Education Movement. In order to improve understanding of OAoL a literature review was conducted as a meta-synthesis of 100 studies on ICT-based assessment published from 1995 to 2015, selected from well-established peer-reviewed databases. The purpose of this study focused on identifying the common topics between ICT-based assessment and OAoL which is considered as an Open Educational Practice.

The review showed that extensive use of the Internet makes it easy to achieve some special features of OAoL as collaboration or sharing, which are considered negative or inconvenient in traditional assessment but at the same time become elements that promote innovation on that topic. It was also found that there is still a great resistance to accept change (as OAoL does) when structural elements of traditional assessment are questioned or challenged.

Author Biographies

Andres Chiappe, Universidad de La Sabana

Centro de Tecnologías para la Academia

Ricardo Alfonso Pinto, Universidad Piloto de Colombia

Telecommunications Engineering Program

Vivian Arias, Universidad de la Sabana

Centro de Tecnologías para la Academia

Published

2016-12-06

How to Cite

Chiappe, A., Pinto, R. A., & Arias, V. (2016). Open Assessment of Learning: A Meta-Synthesis. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2846

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
3
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
167
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press