Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices

Authors

  • Moriah Smothers University of Southern Indiana
  • Tori Colson University of Southern Indiana
  • Stacey Keown University of Southern Indiana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4675

Keywords:

distance education, self-efficacy, teacher education, inclusion

Abstract

A causal-comparative research design was used to examine the influence of course delivery (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online) on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom. The following research questions were used to guide the study: (a) Is there a relationship between completing an introduction of exceptionalities course and participants’ self-efficacy toward teaching an inclusive classroom? (b) Is there a relationship between completing an introduction of exceptionalities course in an asynchronous online or face-to-face flipped format on participants’ self-efficacy beliefs toward teaching in an inclusive classroom? The purpose of this study was to explore if there is a relationship between self-efficacy belief development and course delivery models. The results indicated a significant difference in self-efficacy beliefs towards teaching in an inclusive classroom after completing an introduction of exceptionalities course. However, there was no significant difference in the participants’ efficacy based on the course delivery model (face-to-face flipped or asynchronous online). Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Author Biographies

Tori Colson, University of Southern Indiana

Assistant Professor of Education

Director of Graduate Programs in Education

Stacey Keown, University of Southern Indiana

Assistant Professor

Teacher Education

Published

2020-03-04

How to Cite

Smothers, M., Colson, T., & Keown, S. (2020). Does Delivery Model Matter? The Influence of Course Delivery Model on Teacher Candidates’ Self-Efficacy Beliefs Towards Inclusive Practices. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4675

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
82
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press