Evaluation of Student Feedback Within a MOOC Using Sentiment Analysis and Target Groups

Authors

  • Karsten Lundqvist Victoria University of Wellington http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-1519
  • Tharindu Liyanagunawardena University College of Estate Management
  • Louise Starkey Victoria University of Wellington

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4783

Keywords:

MOOC, teaching programming, sentiment analysis, target group, feedback, learner analytics

Abstract

Many course designers trying to evaluate the experience of participants in a MOOC will find it difficult to track and analyse the online actions and interactions of students because there may be thousands of learners enrolled in courses that sometimes last only a few weeks. This study explores the use of automated sentiment analysis in assessing student experience in a beginner computer programming MOOC. A dataset of more than 25,000 online posts made by participants during the course was analysed and compared to student feedback. The results were further analysed by grouping participants according to their prior knowledge of the subject: beginner, experienced, and unknown. In this study, the average sentiment expressed through online posts reflected the feedback statements. Beginners, the target group for the MOOC, were more positive about the course than experienced participants, largely due to the extra assistance they received. Many experienced participants had expected to learn about topics that were beyond the scope of the MOOC. The results suggest that MOOC designers should consider using sentiment analysis to evaluate student feedback and inform MOOC design.

Published

2020-05-14

How to Cite

Lundqvist, K., Liyanagunawardena, T., & Starkey, L. (2020). Evaluation of Student Feedback Within a MOOC Using Sentiment Analysis and Target Groups. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4783

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
4
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
81%
33%
Days to publication 
84
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press