Video Lectures: An Analysis of Their Useful Life Span and Sustainable Production
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5553Keywords:
video lecture, sustainable education, higher education, useful life, cost-effectivenessAbstract
The learning effectiveness of video lectures has been extensively studied by the scientific community, but research on their cost-effectiveness and sustainable production is still very scarce. To shed light on these aspects, this study has measured the useful life span and cost-effectiveness of a large catalog of video lectures produced for undergraduate courses at a Spanish university. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis has been performed to identify factors linked to video longevity. The analysis accounted for variables such as the video production style (screencast, slideshow, chalk and talk, talking head, and on-location film) and others such as the instructional purpose and field of knowledge. The teachers involved in video production and integration have been surveyed to discover causes of video obsolescence. In addition, using life span and production cost data, the cost-effectiveness of each production style over time was estimated. The results suggest that production style affects video longevity, and in particular, dynamic visuals are more related to longer life spans compared with static contents. Screencast stands out as the most cost-effective production style, having the best ratio of life span to production effort. Some practical suggestions are provided for producing video lectures with higher longevity expectations.
References
Alharthi, A. D., Spichkova, M., & Hamilton, M. (2019). Sustainability requirements for eLearning systems: A systematic literature review and analysis. Requirements Engineering, 24(4), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-018-0299-9
Brosig, B., Kupfer, J., Niemeier, V., & Gieler, U. (2001). The “Dorian Gray syndrome”: Psychodynamic need for hair growth restores and other “fountains of youth.” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 39(7), 279–283. https://doi.org/10.5414/cpp39279
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
Crook, C., & Schofield, L. (2017). The video lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.05.003
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). Effects of observing the instructor draw diagrams on learning from multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000065
Furini, M., Galli, G., & Martini, M. C. (2020). An online education system to produce and distribute video lectures. Mobile Networks and Applications, 25, 969–976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-019-01236-4
Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement : An empirical study of MOOC videos. In M. Sahami & A. Fox (Chairs), L@S 2014—Proceedings of the 1st ACM Conference on Learning at Scale (pp. 41–50). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
Han, S., & Wong, R. (2009). Incorporating audio-visual materials in university teaching: Results of a faculty survey and corresponding actions of the library. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 15(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614530903106620
Henrich, A., & Sieber, S. (2009). Blended learning and pure e-learning concepts for information retrieval: Experiences and future directions. Information Retrieval, 12(2), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-008-9079-3
Hollands, F. M., & Tirthali, D. (2014). Resource requirements and costs of developing and delivering MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1901
Houston, C. (2000). Video usage and active learning strategies among community college faculty members. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 24(5), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/106689200263953
Ibrahim, M., Antonenko, P. D., Greenwood, C. M., & Wheeler, D. (2012). Effects of segmenting, signalling, and weeding on learning from educational video. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 220–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.585993
Ilioudi, C., Chorianopoulos, K., & Giannakos, M. N. (2013, 8–10 November). Comparing the camera shot styles of video lectures: Close-up versus broad framing of whiteboard and lecturer [Paper presentation]. 7th International Conference in Open and Distance Learning, Athens, Greece.
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281868
Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011
Liber, O. (2005). Learning objects: Conditions for viability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(5), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00143.x
Mardis, M. A. (2009). Learning, media and technology viewing Michigan’s digital future: Results of a survey of educators’ use of digital video in the USA. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880903141539
Meinert, E., Alturkistani, A., Foley, K. A., Brindley, D., & Car, J. (2019). Examining cost measurements in production and delivery of three case studies using e-learning for applied health sciences: Cross-case synthesis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(6), e13574. https://doi.org/10.2196/13574
Nissenson, P. M., & Shih, A. C. (2015). MOOC on a budget: Development and implementation of a low-cost MOOC at a state university. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (122nd ASEE) (pp. 26.1168.1–26.1168.25). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.24505
Norman, M. K. (2017). Twelve tips for reducing production time and increasing long-term usability of instructional video. Medical Teacher, 39(8), 808–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2017.1322190
Poquet, O., Lim, L., Mirriahi, N., & Dawson, S. (2018). Video and learning: A systematic review (2007–2017). In A. Pardo et al. (Chairs), LAK ’18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 151–160). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170358.3170376
Renaud, J., Britton, S., Wang, D., & Ogihara, M. (2015). Mining library and university data to understand library use patterns. The Electronic Library, 33(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2013-0136
Santos Espino, J. M., Afonso Suárez, M. D., & González Henríquez, J. J. (2020). Video for teaching: Classroom use, instructor self-production and teachers’ preferences in presentation format. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 29(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1726805
Spanjers, I. A. E., Wouters, P., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.011
StataCorp. (2017). Stata statistical software: Release 15 [Computer software]. StataCorp LLC. https://www.stata.com/
Stepanyan, K., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Sustainable e-learning: Toward a coherent body of knowledge. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(2), 91–102. http://oro.open.ac.uk/42265/
Türkay, S. (2016). The effects of whiteboard animations on retention and subjective experiences when learning advanced physics topics. Computers and Education, 98, 102–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.004
Turro, C., Cañero, A., & Busquets, J. (2010). Video learning objects creation with Polimedia. In Proceedings—2010 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, ISM 2010 (pp. 371–376). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2010.69
van der Meij, H., & van der Meij, J. (2013). Eight guidelines for the design of instructional videos for software training. Technical Communication, 60(3), 205–228. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2013/00000060/00000003/art00004
Wilson, K. E., Martinez, M., Mills, C., D’Mello, S., Smilek, D., & Risko, E. F. (2018). Instructor presence effect: Liking does not always lead to learning. Computers and Education, 122, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.011
Winslett, G. (2014). What counts as educational video? Working toward best practice alignment between video production approaches and outcomes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(5). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.458
Young, D. (2008, December 1–4). E-learning lifecycle costs : Up-front decisions for managers and ISDs [Paper presentation]. Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) 2008, Orlando, Florida.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
