From Physical to Virtual: A New Learning Norm in Music Education for Gifted Students

Authors

  • Md Jais Ismail Faculty of Music, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Azu Farhana Anuar Student Development, UniKL MICET, Universiti Kuala Lumpur, Alor Gajah Campus, Melaka, Malaysia
  • Fung Chiat Loo Department of Music, Faculty of Human Ecology, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.5615

Keywords:

music education, distance learning, COVID-19, pre-experimental, two-way MANOVA, online learning

Abstract

Music education is a subject that is generally thought to have much physical activity involved. However, virtual learning has been mandatary applied to most schools worldwide due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The landscape of music learning has had to be switched to online distance learning (ODL), where students learn music virtually using technological tools. Gifted students are among those affected by the implementation of music ODL throughout 2020. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify the effectiveness of music ODL on gifted students’ motivation. The researchers framed this quantitative study by involving 81 secondary gifted students, aged 13 years, from 13 states in Malaysia. The sample was selected through random sampling, and a preexperimental design was applied to conduct the study. Respondents had been exposed to the music ODL intervention for a month. Data were collected through an adapted questionnaire, namely, the MUSIC Inventory, with a five-point scale. Data were further analysed by descriptive and inferential statistics, integrating two-way MANOVA, using SPSS Statistics version 23. Results reveal that an ODL approach to music classes is significantly effective to enhance gifted students’ motivation domains of empowerment, usefulness, success, interest, and caring. Yet, no significant difference was found in gifted students’ genders and locations on the four domains. Different approaches in music teaching could be further explored for music ODL to gifted students in future studies.

References

Abakumova, I., Bakaeva, I., Grishina, A., & Dyakova, E. (2019). Active learning technologies in distance education of gifted students. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 7(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1901085A

Almusharraf, N., & Khahro, S. (2020). Students satisfaction with online learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(21), 246–267. https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-jet/article/view/15647/0

Anderhag, P., Wickman, P. O., Bergqvist, K., Jakobson, B., Hamza, K. M., & Säljö, R. (2016). Why do secondary school students lose their interest in science? Or does it never emerge? A possible and overlooked explanation. Science Education, 100(5), 791–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21231

Armstrong, V. (2013). Technology and the gendering of music education. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.

Atabey, D. (2021). COVID-19 from the perspective of preschool prospective teachers: What can we do for children? International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 3(1), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.76

Atterbury, B. W. (1990). Speaking the “gifted and talented” language: The key to program success. Music Educators Journal, 76(7), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/3401037

Bartel, L., & Cameron, Linda. (2004). From dilemmas to experience: Shaping the conditions of learning. In L. Bartel (Ed). Questioning the music education paradigm (Vol. II, pp. 39-61). Canadian Music Educators Association. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/24437

Comber, C., Hargreaves, D. J., & Colley, A. (1993). Girls, boys and technology in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 10(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265051700001583

Davies, R. B. (1971). Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternatives. Biometrika, 74(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.2307/2336019

Dori, Y. J., Zohar, A., Fischer-Shachor, D., Kohan-Mass, J., & Carmi, M. (2018). Gender-fair assessment of young gifted students’ scientific thinking skills. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 595–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1431419

Doshi, D., Karunakar, P., Sukhabogi, J. R., Prasanna, J. S., & Mahajan, S. V. (2020). Assessing coronavirus fear in Indian population using the Fear of COVID-19 Scale. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00332-x

Edward, C. N., Asirvatham, D., & Johar, G. (2019). The impact of teaching Oriental music using blended learning approach: An experimental study. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 16(1), 81–103. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1219911

Feldhusen, J. F. (2005). Giftedness, talent, expertise, and creative achievement. Conceptions of giftedness, 2, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.006

Hassan, S. N. S., Tamuri, A. H., Othaman, I., & Mamat, M. S. (2009). Kajian persepsi pelajar terhadap tahap profesionalisme guru Pendidikan Islam MRSM. JIAE: Journal of Islamic and Arabic Education, 1(2), 31–50. http://journalarticle.ukm.my/768/

Hernández-Torrano, D. (2018). Urban–rural excellence gaps: Features, factors, and implications. Roeper Review, 40(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2018.1393610

Hymer, B., & Michel, D. (2013). Gifted and talented learners: Creating a policy for inclusion. Routledge.

Ismail, M. J., Hamuzan, H. A., & Maarof, N. H. (2021). Meneroka tingkah laku unik pelajar pintar cerdas berbakat akademik [Exploring Unique Behavior of Gifted Students with Academic Talented]. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 301-328. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.11

Ismail, M. J., Loo, F. C., & Anuar, A. F. (2021). Learning music through rhythmic movements in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.1.10

Ismail, M. J., Loo, F. C., Anuar, A. F, Yusof, R. (2020). Institutionalising the Kompang for primary school students in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(5), 275–292. https://www.ijicc.net/index.php/volume-13-2020/188-vol-13-iss-5

Jones, B. D. (2017, December). User guide for assessing the components of the MUSIC® Model of Motivation. https://www.themusicmodel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/User-Guide-to-Assessing-the-MUSIC-Model-Components-December-2017-2.pdf

Keast, D. A. (2009). A constructivist application for online learning in music. Research and Issues in Music Education, 7(1), 1–8. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ894765.pdf

Kerr, B. A., & Huffman, J. M. (2018). Gender and talent development of gifted students. In S. I. Pfeiffer (Ed.), Handbook of giftedness in children: Psychoeducational theory, research, and best practices (2nd ed., pp. 115–128). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77004-8_8

Kuntsche, E., Le Mével, L., & Berson, I. (2016). Development of the four-dimensional Motives for Listening to Music Questionnaire (MLMQ) and associations with health and social issues among adolescents. Psychology of Music, 44(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735614562635

Loo, F. Y., & Loo, F. C. (2021, March 8–9). The Importance of a cultural-embedded learning model: Raising awareness of cultural heritage. In edited L. G. Chova, A. L. Martinez, & I. C. Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Technology, Education and Development Conference (pp. 308–316). IATED Academy. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.0090

Loo, F. Y., Loo, F. C., & Chai, K. E. (2016). Learning traditional Malay folk song and tempo control by using an M-learning model design for beginner pianists. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology [special issue], 41–46.

Md Jais, I., & Azu Farhana, A. (2020). The significance of music to gifted students. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(4), 33–43. http://qjoest.com/qjssh/index.php/qjssh/article/view/21

Mills, M. (2000). Issues in implementing boys’ programme in schools: Male teachers and empowerment. Gender and Education, 12(2), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250050010027

Montacute, R., & Cullinane, C. (2018). Parent power 2018: How parents use financial and cultural resources to boost their children’s chances of success. Sutton Trust. http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/32179

Noddings, N. (2012). The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, 38(6), 771–781. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.745047

Pallant, J. 2011. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th ed.). Open University Press. https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/8839418

Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In S. M. Reis (Ed.), Reflections on gifted education: Critical works by Joseph S. Renzulli and colleagues (pp. 55–90). Prufrock Press Inc. https://www.routledge.com/Reflections-on-Gifted-Education-Critical-Works-by-Joseph-S-Renzulli-and/Renzulli-Reis/p/book/9781618215055

Rogers, J., & Revesz, A. (2020). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Routledge.

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental research statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Holt Rinehart & Winston.

Ruokonen, I., & Ruismäki, H. (2016). E-learning in music: A case study of learning group composing in a blended learning environment. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.039

Ruthmann, S. A., & Hebert, D. G. (2012). Music learning and new media in virtual and online environments. In S. A. Ruthmann & D. G. Hebert (Eds)., The Oxford handbook of music education, Vol. 2 (pp. 567–583). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928019.013.003

Schmidt, C. P. (2005). Relations among motivation, performance achievement, and music experience variables in secondary instrumental music students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(2), 134–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345514

Song, L., Singleton, E. S., Hill, J. R., & Koh, M. H. (2004). Improving online learning: Student perceptions of useful and challenging characteristics. The internet and higher education, 7(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2003.11.003

Spencer, J. (2020, October 15). Empowering students in distance learning environments. John Spencer. https://spencerauthor.com/empower-distance-learning/

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using multivariate statistics. Harper & Row.

Urruzola, M. V., & Bernaras, E. (2020). Music performance anxiety in 8-to 12-year-old children. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.), 25(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2019.10.003

VanTassel-Baska, J. (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Allyn & Bacon.

Wallace, P. (2005). Distance education for gifted students: Leveraging technology to expand academic options. High Ability Studies, 16(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130500115288

Wen, K. Y. K., & Kim Hua, T. (2020). ESL teachers’ intention in adopting online educational technologies during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.387.394

Zhang, T., Wang, Z., Liu, G., & Shao, J. (2019). Teachers’ caring behavior and problem behaviors in adolescents: The mediating roles of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Personality and Individual Differences, 142(1), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.005

Published

2022-05-02

How to Cite

Ismail, M. J., Anuar, A. F., & Loo, F. C. (2022). From Physical to Virtual: A New Learning Norm in Music Education for Gifted Students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 23(2), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i2.5615

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
3
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
86%
33%
Days to publication 
434
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Athabasca University Press