University Students’ Persistence With Technology-Mediated Distance Education: A Response to COVID-19 and Beyond in Zimbabwe
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v23i1.5758Keywords:
flexible learning, information and communication technologies, online education, technology advances, technology-mediated distance educationAbstract
Technology-mediated distance education (TDE) has become part of the new normal in the range of teaching strategies used in universities in Zimbabwe. Contemporary literature abounds with studies that highlight challenges associated with access to education in universities, yet very little is highlighted about how TDE can be used to enhance access to education in Zimbabwean universities during the COVID-19 era and beyond. The purpose of this study was therefore to investigate determinants of students’ behavioural intentions to persist with TDE in universities in Zimbabwe during COVID-19 and beyond. The study employed a quantitative approach that used a self-constructed structured questionnaire for data collection from a sample of 1,300 distance learning students selected from five universities using a stratified random sampling strategy. Structural equation modelling using IBM SPSS Amos 22 was used for data analysis. Results of the study show that cultural and norms issues (β = .325; p < .001) and characteristics of the students (β = .329; p < .001), the lecturer (β = .362; p < .001), the institution (β = .427; p < .001), and external stakeholders (β = .279; p < .001) were all significantly associated with the behavioural intentions of university students to persist with TDE. Results of this study have implications for both policy and practice with regard to implementing TDE in universities.
References
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journalof Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150783
Au, O. T., Li, K., & Wong, T. M. (2019). Student persistence in open and distance learning:Success factors and challenges. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 13(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-12-2018-0030
Bagozzi, R. P. (1984). A prospectus for theory construction in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251307
Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Base, C. (2018). Understanding basic statistics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. https://www.webassign.net/features/textbooks/bbbasicstat8/details.html
Bhuasiri, W., Xaymoungkhoun, O., Zo, H., Rho, J. J., & Ciganek, A. P. (2012). Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty. Computers & Education, 58(2), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.010
Bolliger, D. U., & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 39, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments in nature and design. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674224575
Creswell, J. W. (2015), Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (5th ed.). Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/product/Creswell-Educational-Research-Planning-Conducting-and-Evaluating-Quantitative-and-Qualitative-Research-Subscription-5th-Edition/9780133549645.html
Ettekal, A. V, & Mahoney, J. L. (2017). Ecological systems theory. In K. Peppler (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (pp. 10–12). Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385198.n94
Exploring Your Mind. (2020). IT trends in education for 2020. https://exploringyourmind.com/it-trends-in-education-for-2020/
Fenske, M. (2007). Movement and resistance: (Tattooed) bodies and performance. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 4(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420601138302
Fidalgo, P., Thormann, J., Kulyka, O., & Lencastre, J. A. (2020). Students’ perceptions on distance education: A multinational study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(18), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00194-2
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gao, S., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Johnston, R. A. (2008). Nonnormality of data in structural equation models. Transportation Research Record, 2082(1), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.3141/2082-14
Guy-Evans, O. (2020, November 9). Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/Bronfenbrenner.html
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications. https://www.pls-sem.net/downloads/1st-edition-a-primer-on-pls-sem/
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2019). A posthumanist critique of flexible online learning and its “anytime anyplace” claims. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50, 1005–1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12779
Ilieva, J., Steve B., & Nigel, M. H. (2002). Online surveys in marketing research: Pros and cons. International Journal of Market Research, 44(3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530204400303
Joyce, M., & Kirakowski, J. (2015). Measuring attitudes towards the Internet: The general Internet attitude scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(8), 506–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1064657
Kaputa, T. M. (2013). Making open and distance learning inclusive: The Zimbabwe Open University’s experience with people with disabilities. Greener Journal of Educational Research, 3(8), 392–401. https://gjournals.org/GJER/archive/oct-2013-vol-38/kaputa.html
Kline, R. B. (2005). Methodology in the social sciences. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. https://www.guilford.com/books/Principles-and-Practice-of-Structural-Equation-Modeling/Rex-Kline/9781462523344
Krebs, R. J. (2009). Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory of Human Development and the process of development of sports talent. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40(1), 108–135. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-04771-006
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. (2019). Factors related to student persistence in open universities: Changes over the years. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i4.4103
Lindemann, N. (2021, August 9). What’s the average survey response rate? [2021 benchmark]. Survey Anyplace. https://surveyanyplace.com/average-survey-response-rate/
Liu, Q., Geertshuis, S., & Grainger, R. (2020). Understanding academics' adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857.
Maphosa, V. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on remote-based teaching and learning in the COVID-19 era: Rethinking technology availability and suitability in Zimbabwe. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(1), Article e02105. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/9684
McGhie, V. (2017). Entering university studies: Identifying enabling factors for a successful transition from school to university. Higher Education Journal, 73(3), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0100-2
McLeod, S. A. (2019). Z-score: Definition, calculation and interpretation. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/z-score.html
Musingafi, M. C. C., Mapuranga, B., Chiwanza, K., & Zebron, S. (2015). Challenges for open and distance learning (ODL) students: Experiences from students of the Zimbabwe Open University. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(18), 59–66. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079750
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2020). Education at a Glance 2020: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/
Ouma, R. (2019). Transforming university learner support in open and distance education: Academic staff and students perceived challenges and prospects. Cogent Education, 6, 1 – 15. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1658934
QuestionPro. (2020). What is a good survey response rate? https://www.questionpro.com/blog/good-survey-response-rate/
The Research Advisors. (2006). Sample size table. http://research-advisors.com/index.php
Rodríguez-Ardura, I., & Meseguer-Artola, A. (2020). How to prevent, detect and control common method variance in electronic commerce research. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(2), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762020000200101
Rosenberg, J., & Ranellucci, J. (2017, May 8). Student motivation in online science courses: A path to spending more time on course and higher achievement. Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute Blog. https://michiganvirtual.org/blog/student-motivation-in-online-science-courses-a-path-to-spending-more-time-on-course-and-higher-achievement/
Rudhumbu, N. (2020). Antecedents of university lecturers’ intentions to adopt information and communication technology in Zimbabwe. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 5117–5132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10205-4
Rupande, G., & Nyenya, T. (2014). Accessibility and affordability of ODL in Zimbabwe: A reality or a myth? International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(4), 21–29. https://www.arcjournals.org/pdfs/ijhsse/v1-i4/3.pdf
SAIDE. (1999). An overview of distance education in Zimbabwe. Southern Africa Global Distance Education Net. http://colfinder.net/materials/Supporting_Distance_Education_Through_Policy_Development/resources/worldbank/countries/zimbabwe/zimoverview.htm
Selwyn, N. (1997). Students’ attitudes toward computers: Validation of a computer attitude scale for 16–19 education. Computers & Education, 28(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(96)00035-8
Sharma, R. C. (2018). Is open and distance education ready for the digital innovations? Distance Education in China, 8, 31–45. DOI:10.13541/j.cnki.chinade.20180525.001
Sinclair, M., O’Toole, J., Malawaraarachchi, M., et al. (2012). Comparison of response rates and cost-effectiveness for a community-based survey: postal, internet and telephone modes with generic or personalised recruitment approaches. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-132 on 17 March 2021.
Tait, A. (2018). Education for development: From distance to open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 101–115. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/294
Tam, G., & El-Azar, D. (2020). 3 ways the coronavirus pandemic could reshape education. World Economic Forum: Global agenda. file:///D:/COVID/3%20ways%20the%20coronavirus%.
UNESCO. (2018). ICT transforming education in Africa: UNESCO-KFIT project update, February 2018. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261534
UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse
Vanides, J. (2018). Let’s talk online learning. The New Media Consortium (NMC).
World Health Organization (WHO). (2009). Changing cultural and social norms that support violence. https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/norms.pdf
Yang, D., Baldwin, S., & Snelson, C. (2017). Persistence factors revealed: Students’ reflections on completing a fully online program. Distance Education, 38(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1299561
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
