Can Open Pedagogy Encourage Care? Student Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.6901Keywords:
open pedagogy, ethics of care, inclusion, student perspectivesAbstract
As a response to the increasing commercialization of postsecondary education, educators argue for a practice of care in education. Open pedagogy (OP) seems like an ideal practice where care, trust, and inclusion can be realized. OP is characterized as a democratic and collaborative pedagogical practice, in which students and teachers work to co-create learning and knowledge using openly licensed materials, open platforms, and other open processes. The purposes of this study were, first, to reveal ways students in postsecondary institutions perceive care and, second, to determine how students suggest OP can be used to create an open/caring learning process. A task-oriented focus group method engaged students from four teaching-focused institutions. The students created open cases on social issues for class discussion and reflected on care and OP processes in postsecondary settings. Using four elements of the ethics of care—attentiveness, responsibility, competence, and trustworthiness—as conceptual categories, the study examined students’ experience of care and care in OP using affective coding and thematic analysis. The results showed that through OP, with teacher support and explicitly designed practices of care, students can assert their agency, have quintessential roles in creating and participating in highly relevant curriculum and importantly, care about others, and be cared for. OP is a process able to involve a diverse population of students and embody care as an all-encompassing practice.
References
Anderson, V., Rabello, R., Wass, R., Golding, C., Rangi, A., Eteuati, E., Bristowe, Z., & Waller, A. (2020). Good teaching as care in higher education. Higher Education, 79, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00392-6
Ashman, M. (2021, October 19). Faculty & student perceptions of open pedagogy: A BC case study [video]. The open education conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lrm7yyJcIA
Axe, J., Childs, E., DeVries, I., & Webster, K. (2020). Student experiences of Open Educational Practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 16(4), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135340
Bali, M., Cronin, C., & Jhangiani, R. S. (2020). Framing open educational practices from a social justice perspective. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2020(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.565
Baran, E., & AlZoubi, D. (2020). Affordances, challenges, and impact of open pedagogy: Examining students’ voices. Distance Education, 41(2), 230–244. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757409
Barnes, M., Brannelly, T., Ward, L., & Ward, N. (2015). Conclusion: Renewal and transformation—the importance of an ethics of care. In M. Barnes, T. Brannelly, L. Ward, & N. Ward (Eds.), Ethics of care: Critical advances in international perspective (1st ed., 233–244). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t89d95.22
Bergmark, U. (2019). Rethinking researcher–teacher roles and relationships in educational action research through the use of Nel Noddings’ Ethics of Care. Educational Action Research, 28(3), 331–344. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09650792.2019.1567367
Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships, Higher Education 71, 195–208. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-015-9896-4
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/thematic-analysis/book248481
Carey, P. (2013). Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: A case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(3), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.796714
Clinton-Lisell, V. (2018). Savings without sacrifice: A case report on open-source textbook adoption. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 33(3), 177–189. https://tinyurl.com/2226xn7w
Clinton-Lisell, V. (2021). Open pedagogy: A systematic review of empirical findings. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 255–268. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/511
Cook-Sather, A. (2015). Dialogue across differences of position, perspective, and identity: Reflective practice in/on a student-faculty pedagogical partnership program. Teachers College Record, 117, 2. https://repository.brynmawr.edu/edu_pubs/32/
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5). https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3096
DeRosa, R., & Jhangiani, R. (n.d.). Open pedagogy. Open Pedagogy Notebook. https://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/books/e/10.5334/bbc/
DeRosa, R., & Robison, S. (2017). From OER to open pedagogy: Harnessing the power of open. In R. S. Jhangiani & R. Biswas-Diener (Eds.). Open: The philosophy and practices that are revolutionizing education and science. Ubiquity Press. http://www.ubiquitypress.com/site/chapters/10.5334/bbc.i/download/597/
Faulkner, S. L., Watson, W. K., Pollino, M., & Shetterly, J. (2020). “Treat me like a person, rather than another number”: University student perceptions of inclusive classroom practices. Communication Education, 70(1), 92–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1812680
Frizelle, K. L. (2020). The personal is pedagogical: Personal narratives and embodiment as teaching strategies in higher education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.20853/34-2-3533
Hardwick, J. (2021, January 29). Pandemic pedagogy and the labour of care. KPU Teaching and Learning Commons. https://wordpress.kpu.ca/tlcommons/pandemic-pedagogy-and-the-labour-of-care/
Harrison, M. (2021, January 12). Learners navigating open spaces. BCCampus Research Fellows. BCcampus News. https://bccampus.ca/2021/01/12/learners-navigating-open-spaces/
Hegarty, B. (2015). Attributes of open pedagogy: A model for using open educational resources. Educational Technology, 55(4), 3–13. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44430383
Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, political and global. Oxford University Press. https://academic.oup.com/book/2881
Hendricks, C. (2021, May 7). Student perceptions of writing open case studies: A work in progress. [presentation]. KPU: Open Education Research Institute. https://osf.io/2eh8y/
Hilton III, J., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & Williams, L. (2016). Maintaining momentum toward graduation: OER and the course throughput rate. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6), http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2686/3967
Hilton III, J., Wiley, D., Chaffee, R., Darrow, J., Guilmett, J., Harper, S., & Hilton, B. (2019). Student perceptions of open pedagogy: An exploratory study. Open Praxis, 11(3), 275. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.11.3.973
Hodgkinson-Williams, C. A., & Trotter, H. (2018). A social justice framework for understanding open educational resources and practices in the Global South. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 204–224. https://jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/312.
Jhangiani, R. S., Dastur, F. N., Le Grand, R., & Penner, K. (2018). As good or better than commercial textbooks: Students’ perceptions and outcomes from using open digital and open print textbooks. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.1.5
Koseoglu, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
Krueger, R., & Casey, M. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research [e-book]. (5th ed.). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book/focus-groups-6
Lambert, S. R. (2018). Changing our (dis)course: A distinctive social justice aligned definition of open education. Journal of Learning for Development, 5(3), 225–244. http://www.jl4d.org/index.php/ejl4d/article/view/290
Lansdown, K. (2021, October 19). Open education through an ethics of care and justice [video]. The open education conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i74KEAJnoPY
Lolich, L., & Lynch, K. (2016). Aligning the market and affective self: Care and student resistance to entrepreneurial subjectivities. Gender and Education 29(1): 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1197379
Mariskind, C. (2014). Teachers' care in higher education: Contesting gendered constructions, Gender and Education, 26(3), 306–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2014.901736
Maultsaid, D. (2022, May 6). Open pedagogy and the inclusion of marginalized students. KPU Teaching and Learning Commons. https://wordpress.kpu.ca/tlcommons/open-pedagogy-and-the-inclusion-of-marginalized-students/
Maultsaid, D. (2023, April 29). Research on open pedagogy: Focus group guidelines and reflection prompts. Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/v5ghs/
Molesworth, M., Nixon, E., & Scullion, R. (2009). Having, being and higher education: The marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510902898841
Morgan, T. (2016, December 21). Open pedagogy and a very brief history of the concept. Explorations in the Ed Tech World. https://homonym.ca/uncategorized/open-pedagogy-and-a-very-brief-history-of-the-concept/
Noddings, N. (2012) The caring relation in teaching. Oxford Review of Education, (38)6, 771–781. https://DOI:10.1080/03054985.2012.745047
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press. https://www.ucpress.edu/book/9780520275706/caring
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Paquette, C. (1979). Quelques fondements d ’ une Pédagogie Ouverte. Québec Français, 36, 20–21. https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/51334ac
Parvati, R. (2019). Race and feminist care ethics: Intersectionality as method, Gender, Place & Culture, 26(5), 613–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2019.1567471
Robertson, T. (2020). Ch. 18: Diversity, equity and inclusion in open research and education. In M. Bali, C. Cronin, L. Czerniewicz, R. DeRosa & R.S. Jhangiani (Eds.) Open at the Margins: Critical perspectives on open education. Rebus Community. https://press.rebus.community/openatthemargins/chapter/diversity-equity-and-inclusion-in-open-research-and-education/
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications, Inc. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/the-coding-manual-for-qualitative-researchers/book273583
Sinkinson, C., & McLure, M. (n.d.). Care in the open: A framework [website]. https://caring.openped.buffscreate.net/
Sinkinson, C., & McLure, M. (2021, October 19). Care in the open: A framework [video]. The Open Education Conference. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o30jSKCV4O4
Siry, C., & Zawatski, E. (2011). “Working with” as a methodological stance: Collaborating with students in teaching, writing, and research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(3), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2010.539581
Tomlinson, M. (2016). Students’ perception of themselves as “consumers” of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1113856
Tronto, J. (2013). Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. New York University Press. https://nyupress.org/9780814782781/caring-democracy/
Tronto, J. (2017). There is an alternative: Homines curans and the limits of neoliberalism. International Journal of Care and Caring, 1(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788217X14866281687583
Velasquez, A., West, R., Graham, C., & Osguthorpe, R. (2013). Developing caring relationships in schools: A review of the research on caring and nurturing pedagogies. Review of Education (Oxford), 1(2), 162–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3014
Vojtech, G., & Grissett, J. (2017). Student perceptions of college faculty who use OER. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4), 155–171. https://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3032/4215
Waghid, Y. (2018). On care and dissonance within pedagogical encounters. International Journal of Care and Caring, 2(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788218X15321004821311
Walker, C., & Gleaves, A. (2016). Constructing the caring higher education teacher: A theoretical framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.013
Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). Exploring student perceptions as co-authors of course material. Open Praxis, 13(1), 53–67. http://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.13.1.1187
Wilkinson, R. G. (2020). Creative arts personal pedagogy vs marketised higher education: A battle between values. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(3), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12295
Wymer, K., & Fulford, C. (2019). Students as co-producers of queer pedagogy. Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.36021/jethe.v2i1.29
Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Huang, R., Chang, T., Burgos, D., Yang, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). A case study of applying open educational practices in higher education during COVID-19: Impacts on learning motivation and perceptions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(21), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219129
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.