Informal Practices of Localizing Open Educational Resources in Ghana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i2.7102Keywords:
open educational resources, localization, Ghana, qualitative researchAbstract
Research on the use of Open Educational Resources (OER) often notes the potential benefits for users to revise, reuse, and remix OER to localize it for specific learners. However, a gap in the literature exists in terms of research that explores how this localization occurs in practice. This is a significant gap given the current flow of OER from higher-income countries in the Global North to lower-income countries in the Global South (King et al., 2018). This study explores how OER from one area of the world is localized when it is used in a different cultural context.
Findings indicated complex encounters with decontextualized content and a variety of localization practices. Participants experienced challenges with technology due to low bandwidth and hardware problems, as well as language problems given Ghana’s history of colonial rule. Native speakers of Twi are less proficient reading Twi than their national language, English. As facilitators worked to overcome these challenges, they were most likely to informally localize content in intuitive ways during the class based on students’ needs. Informal, in-the-moment practices included translating content into Twi, persisting through technological challenges, using local stories and pictures, localizing through discussion, and teaching responsively. These findings have implications for designers to design collaboratively with technological and linguistic flexibility for localization. More research on the practice of OER localization would refine our understanding of how OER is localized and what barriers and affordances exist to this practice.
References
Adeyeye, B. A., & Mason, J. (2020). Opening futures for Nigerian education: Integrating educational technologies with Indigenous knowledge and practices. Open Praxis, 12(1), 27. https//doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.12.1.1055
Amiel, T. (2013). Identifying barriers to the remix of translated open educational resources. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1351
Aramide, K., & Elaturoti, A. (2021, October 18–22). Exchanging knowledge across borders: Open education around the world [Presentation]. Open Education Conference, virtual. https://opened21.sched.com/event/moNW/exchanging-knowledge-across-borders-open-education-around-the-world
Arinto, P. B., Hodgkinson-Williams, C., & Trotter, H. (2017). OER and OEP in the Global South: Implications and recommendations for social inclusion. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 577–592). International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1043829
Churchill, S. D. (2022). Essentials of existential phenomenological research. American Psychological Association.
Clinton-Lisell, V. (2021). Open pedagogy: A systematic review of empirical findings. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v8i2.511
Cobo, C. (2013). Exploration of open educational resources in non-English speaking communities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(2), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i2.1493
Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). Factors shaping lecturers’ adoption of OER at three South African universities. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.) Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 287–347). International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.601935
Creative Commons. (n.d.). About the licenses. Creative Commons. https://creativecommons.org/about/program-areas/education-oer/
de los Arcos, B., & Weller, M. (2018). A tale of two globes: Exploring the north/south divide in engagement with open educational resources. In J. Schöpfel & U. Herb (Eds.), Open divide: Critical studies on open access (pp. 147–155). Litwin Books.
de Oliveira Neto, J. D., Pete, J., Daryono, & Cartmill, T. (2017). OER use in the Global South: A baseline survey of higher education instructors. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 69–118). International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.599535
DeRosa, R. (2016, May 18). My open textbook: Pedagogy and practice. http://robinderosa.net/uncategorized/my-open-textbook-pedagogy-and-practice/
Dunne, J. (1997). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgment and the lure of technique. University of Notre Dame Press.
Ezumah, B. A. (2020). Critical and cultural perspectives of educational technology transfers and theoretical frameworks. In Critical perspectives of educational technology in Africa (pp. 49–67). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53728-9_3
Fleming, V., Gaidys, U., & Robb, Y. (2003). Hermeneutic research in nursing: Developing a Gadamerian-based research method. Nursing Inquiry, 10(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00163.x
Ivins, T. (2011). Localization of open educational resources (OER) in Nepal: Strategies of Himalayan knowledge-workers [Doctoral thesis, Brigham Young University]. BYU Scholars Archive. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/2616/
Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive openness in teacher practice. Teachers College Record, 118(9), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800901
King, M., Pegrum, M., & Forsey, M. (2018). MOOCs and OER in the Global South: Problems and potential. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3742
Mælan, E. N., Tjomsland, H. E., Samdal, O., & Thurston, M. (2020). Pupils’ perceptions of how teachers’ everyday practices support their mental health: A qualitative study of pupils aged 14–15 in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(7), 1015–1029. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1639819
McDonald, J. K. (in press). The everydayness of instructional design and the pursuit of quality in online courses. Online Learning.
Oates, L., & Hashimi, J. (2016). Localizing OER in Afghanistan: Developing a multilingual digital library for Afghan teachers. Open Praxis, 8(2), 151–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.2.288
Omoike, A. (2021, Oct. 18–22). Open pedagogy and practices for sustainable education in Nigeria [Video, conference session]. Open Education Conference, virtual. https://opened21.sched.com/event/moNi/open-pedagogy-and-practices-for-sustainable-education-in-nigeria?iframe=no
Packer, M. (2018). The science of qualitative research. Cambridge University Press.
Prinsloo, P., & Roberts, J. (2022). Analysis of higher education (HE) systems’ approach in South Africa: National infrastructures for digital educational resources. In V. I. Marín, L. N. Peters, & O. Zawacki-Richter (Eds.), (Open) educational resources around the world: An international comparison. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/oer_around_the_world/analysis_of_higher_e
Raj, S., Salman, A., Kumar, B., & Ace, B. (2019). Policy paradox between local and national agencies of education: A lived experience from local curriculum development practices in Nepal. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(3), 159–170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332289034_Policy_paradox_between_local_and_national_agencies_of_education_A_lived_experiences_from_local_curriculum_development_practices_in_Nepal
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2012). 2012 Paris OER declaration. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CI/CI/pdf/Events/English_Paris_OER_Declaration.pdf
West, P. G., & Victor, L. (2011). Background and action paper on OER: A background and action paper for staff of bilateral and multilateral organizations at the strategic institutional education sector level. The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. http://oerbackgroundpaperdraft.pbworks.com/w/page/37756032/FrontPage
Wiley, D. (2021, June 28). The localization paradox. Improving Learning. https://opencontent.org/blog/archives/6819
Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i4.3601
William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. (2013). Open educational resources: Breaking the lockbox on education [White paper]. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/OER%20White%20Paper%20Nov%2022%202013%20Final_0.pdf
Wolfenden, F., & Adinolfi, L. (2019). An exploration of agency in the localisation of open educational resources for teacher development. Learning, Media, and Technology, 44(3), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1628046
Yanchar, S. C., & Slife, B. D. (2017). Theorizing inquiry in the moral space of practice. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 14(2), 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2016.1264517
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
