OXREF: Open XR for Education Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.7109Keywords:
OXREF, open XR, XR for education, XR framework, extended reality, XR scalability, XR sustainability, VR, AR, OER, OEP, open licensesAbstract
Extended reality (XR), which encompasses virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), and mixed reality (MR), offers powerful affordances for improving teaching and learning experiences in a post-pandemic world. Increasingly, many governments and institutions around the world are making major investments in XR technologies to prepare education systems for the future. However, many of these investments remain isolated pilot projects which, while they attest to the potential of XR in education, are unlikely to be scaled up due to lack of sustainability and collaboration. Based on literature and empirical evidence, I have identified major barriers to the wider adoption of XR in education, including the lack of (a) open content, tools, and skills; (b) sound pedagogy and instructional design; and (c) scalability and sustainability. As a potential solution, I introduce the Open XR for Education Framework (OXREF), an empirical framework that proposes a holistic solution to XR object creation, implementation, and deployment, while covering pedagogical, technological, and policy perspectives. The contribution of the OXREF is its ability to build fit-for-purpose XR experiences in a scalable, sustainable, and collaborative manner while promoting openness, accessibility, equity, and reuse. The novelty of the proposed framework is its use of open educational resources (OER), open educational practices (OEP), as well as free and open-source software (FOSS) tools and platforms. Its cloud-based infrastructure and open licenses support viable operationalization strategies that can be implemented by educational institutions and governments.
References
Abeywardena, I. S. (2012). A report on the re-use and adaptation of open educational resources (OER): An exploration of technologies available. Commonwealth of Learning. http://hdl.handle.net/11599/233
Abeywardena, I. S. (2017). An empirical framework for mainstreaming OER in an academic institution. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, 12(2), 230–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAOUJ-11-2017-0036
Abeywardena, I. S. (2021, December). Open extended reality for education framework (OXREF): Mainstreaming XR through institutional collaboration [Conference session]. Waterloo Information Technology and Information Systems (WatITis) Conference. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356878877_OXREF_Open_Extended_Reality_for_Education_Framework
Abeywardena, I. S., & Chan, C. S. (2013). Review of the current OER search dilemma [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 57th World Assembly of International Council on Education for Teaching, (ICET 2013, pp. 25–28). Nonthaburi, Thailand. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ishan-Abeywardena/publication/240310607_Review_of_the_Current_OER_Search_Dilemma/links/02e7e51c54e3671bc4000000/Review-of-the-Current-OER-Search-Dilemma.pdf
Abeywardena, I. S., Raviraja, S., & Tham, C. Y. (2012). Conceptual framework for parametrically measuring the desirability of open educational resources using D-index. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1177
Abeywardena, I. S., Uys, P. M., & Fifita, S. (2019). OER mainstreaming in Tonga. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i1.3924
Afzal, A., Firdousi, S. F., Waqar, A., & Awais, M. (2022). The influence of Internet penetration on poverty and income inequality. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221116104
Alizadehsalehi, S., Hadavi, A., & Huang, J. C. (2020). From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 116, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103254
Beça, P., Ribeiro, S., Santos, R., Aresta, M., Veloso, A. I., & Ortet, C. (2020). Design and initial evaluation of an online portal-repository: The case of Gamers4Nature project. In N. Martins & D. Brandão, (Eds.), Proceedings of Advances in Design and Digital Communication (Digicom 2020). Springer Series in Design and Innovation (Vol. 12, pp. 137–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61671-7_13
Cronin, C. (2017). Openness and praxis: Exploring the use of open educational practices in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(5), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3096
Dash, S., & Pani, S. K. (2016). E-Governance paradigm using cloud infrastructure: Benefits and challenges. Procedia Computer Science, 85, 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.05.274
Dibbern, C., Uhr, M., Krupke, D., & Steinicke, F. (2018). Can WebVR further the adoption of virtual reality? In S. Hess & H. Fischer (Eds.), Humans and Computers 2018: Usability Professionals, (pp. 377–384). https://doi.org/10.18420/muc2018-up-0249
Doolani, S., Wessels, C., Kanal, V., Sevastopoulos, C., Jaiswal, A., Nambiappan, H., & Makedon, F. (2020). A review of extended reality (xr) technologies for manufacturing training. Technologies, 8(4), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies8040077
EDUCAUSE. (2018, May). eXtended reality (XR): How AR, VR, and MR are extending learning opportunities. https://events.educause.edu/eli/focus-sessions/2018/extended-reality-xr-how-ar-vr-and-mr-are-extending-learning-opportunities
Fernandez, M. (2017). Augmented virtual reality: How to improve education systems. Higher Learning Research Communications, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.18870/hlrc.v7i1.373
Friesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i5.664
Garcia Estrada, J., & Prasolova-Førland, E. (2022). Running an XR lab in the context of COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from a Norwegian university. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10446-x
Garnett, A., Leahey, A., Savard, D., Towell, B., & Wilson, L. (2017). Open metadata for research data discovery in Canada. Journal of Library Metadata, 17(3–4), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2018.1443698
Glasserman-Morales, L. D., Ruiz-Ramírez, J. A., & Estrada, F. J. (2022). Transforming higher education using WebVR: A case study. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, 17(3), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/RITA.2022.3191257
Guilbaud, P., Guilbaud, T. C., & Jennings, D. (2021). Extended reality, pedagogy, and career readiness: A review of literature. Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 595–613). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77599-5_41
Hogg, R., & Hogg, M. (1995). Continuous quality improvement in higher education. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/1403776
Höhl, W. (2020). Official survey data and virtual worlds: Designing an integrative and economical open source production pipeline for XR-applications in small and medium-sized enterprises. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(4), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc4040026
India Blooms News Service. (2017, December 16). Samsung India partners with UNESCO to launch VR content and 360-degree videos. https://www.indiablooms.com/finance-details/8251/samsung-india-partners-with-unesco-to-launch-vr-content-and-360-degree-videos.html
Khan, T., Johnston, K., & Ophoff, J. (2019). The impact of an augmented reality application on learning motivation of students. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2019, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7208494
Kluge, M. G., Maltby, S., Keynes, A., Nalivaiko, E., Evans, D. J., & Walker, F. R. (2022). Current state and general perceptions of the use of extended reality (XR) technology at the University of Newcastle: Interviews and surveys from staff and students. SAGE Open, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221093348
Koseoglu, S., & Bozkurt, A. (2018). An exploratory literature review on open educational practices. Distance Education, 39(4), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1520042
Lai, J. W., & Cheong, K. H. (2022). Adoption of virtual and augmented reality for mathematics education: A scoping review. IEEE Access, 10, 13693–13703. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3145991
MacKinnon, T., Pasfield-Neofitou, S., Manns, H., & Grant, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of open educational communities of practice and sustainability in higher educational policy. Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et de Communication, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/alsic.2908
McGreal, R. (2017). Special report on the role of open educational resources in supporting the sustainable development goal 4: Quality education challenges and opportunities. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3541
Meccawy, M. (2022). Creating an immersive XR learning experience: A roadmap for educators. Electronics, 11(21), 3547. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11213547
Mourchid, Y., Renoust, B., Cherifi, H., & El Hassouni, M. (2018). Multilayer network model of movie script. In L. Aiello, C. Cherifi, H. Cherifi, R. Lambiotte, P. Lió & L. Rocha (Eds.), Complex Networks and Their Applications (Vol. 812, pp. 782–796). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05411-3_62
Murray, J. T., & Johnson, E. K. (2021). XR content authoring challenges: The creator-developer divide. In J. A. Fisher (Ed.), Augmented and Mixed Reality for Communities (pp. 245–264). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003052838
Niederhauser, D. S., Howard, S. K., Voogt, J., Agyei, D. D., Laferriere, T., Tondeur, J., & Cox, M. J. (2018). Sustainability and scalability in educational technology initiatives: Research-informed practice. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 507–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9382-z
Pomerantz, J., & Rode, R. (2020). Exploring the future of extended reality in higher education. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/6/exploring-the-future-of-extended-reality-in-higher-education
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What is design thinking and why is it important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Renz, A., & Hilbig, R. (2020). Prerequisites for artificial intelligence in further education: Identification of drivers, barriers, and business models of educational technology companies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00193-3
Rocha Estrada, F. J., Ruiz-Ramírez, J. A., George-Reyes, C. E., & Glasserman-Morales, L. (2022). Evaluation of a virtual campus adapted to WebVR spaces: Assessments of teachers and students. Frontiers in Education, 7, 396. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.918125
Rokhsaritalemi, S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S. M. (2020). A review on mixed reality: Current trends, challenges and prospects. Applied Sciences, 10(2), 636–662. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020636
Schwaiger, M. (2021). Europe needs to integrate immersive learning quickly at all education levels—But how? What to learn from 25 EU projects in this field. Journal of Elementary Education, 14(Special Issue), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.Spec.Iss.63-85.2021
Simon-Liedtke, J. T., Baraas, R., & Regnesentral, N. (2022). The future of extended reality in primary and secondary education. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 297, 549–556. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220886
Spinellis, D. (2012). Git. IEEE Software, 29(3), 100–101. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6188603
Steuer, J. (1992). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
Taibi, D., & Dietze, S. (2016). Towards embedded markup of learning resources on the web: An initial quantitative analysis of LRMI terms usage. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (pp. 513–517). https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/2872518.2890464?casa_token=VvysNQ6m2qMAAAAA:4uM2l6SBqIOVTXGfjKQkjRJ1lD5ew_GQYFb_5CyYXLFyyU3IFMP538QeLy0f3bCF_TVjwxqXdNt6
The Shady Bunch. (2018, December 24). Voyager: Virtual reality (VR) journey through space [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Tn1TqYHPrUM
Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., & Chang, T. W. (2021). The evolution of sustainability models for open educational resources: Insights from the literature and experts. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507
United Nations Virtual Reality. (2017, June 17). Refugee realities: Bringing individual refugee stories to the OECD. Retrieved December 28, 2022 from http://unvr.sdgactioncampaign.org/2017/06/14/refugee-realities-bringing-individual-refugee-stories-to-the-oecd/#.ZGubKX3MK5c
Wang, M., Ryoo, J., & Winkelmann, K. (2020). Preface to the special issue on cross reality (XR) and immersive learning environments (ILE) in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(5), 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1696845
Yanckello, R. (2022, October 28). Hype cycle for higher education, 2022 [Conference session]. EDUCAUSE Annual Conference 2022. https://events.educause.edu/annual-conference/2022/agenda/hype-cycle-for-higher-education-2022
Yang, K., Zhou, X., & Radu, I. (2020). XR-ed framework: Designing instruction-driven and learner-centered extended reality systems for education. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.13779
Ziker, C., Truman, B., & Dodds, H. (2021). Cross reality (XR): Challenges and opportunities across the spectrum. In J. Ryoo & K. Winkelmann (Eds.), Innovative learning environments in STEM higher education: Opportunities, challenges, and looking forward (pp. 55–78). Springer Briefs in Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
