Online Student Engagement: The Overview of HE in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i3.7125Keywords:
student engagement, online learning, mixed-method, IndonesiaAbstract
The use of technology in higher education learning has been shown to increase student engagement. However, how its application can increase student engagement is still largely unreported in Indonesia, especially during and after COVID-19, when online learning was used massively and suddenly. This study aims to examine students’ engagement with online learning using a sequential explanatory mixed-method study design that is expected to produce in-depth information. The study involved a number of n = 775 students, with 149 participants who identified themselves as male (19.3%) and 626 participants who identified themselves as female (80.7%). The age range of the participants was 18 to 22 years (M-age = 20.12). Quantitative data analysis was carried out using descriptive tests and ANOVA variance tests, while qualitative data analysis was carried out using thematic analysis. Integration of quantitative and qualitative data analyses results was conducted using a joint display approach. The results showed that 94.45% (n = 732) of students had low engagement scores. Gender and field of study were found to have no effect on the level of student engagement in online learning (F 1,775 = 3.259, p = .071, η2 = .004). Data integration results showed that online learning reduces emotional attachment, participation, and performance, although it does not reduce students’ skill engagement. Based on student experience, online learning is considered less effective than in-person learning. Students with higher self-regulation show engagement in online learning. The online learning model needs an effective formula for increasing student engagement, in addition to help students develop self-regulation skills.
References
Alexander, V. D., Thomas, H., Cronin, A., Fielding, J., & Moran-Ellis, J. (2008). Mixed methods. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching social life (3rd ed., 125–144). Sage.
Anjarwati, M., & Sa’adah, L. (2021). Student learning engagement in the online class. EnJourMe (English Journal of Merdeka): Culture, Language, and Teaching of English, 6(2) 39–49. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v6i2.6128
Argaheni, N. B. (2020). Sistematik review: Dampak perkuliahan daring saat pandemi COVID-19 terhadap mahasiswa Indonesia. Placentum: Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Dan Aplikasinya, 8(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.20961/placentum.v8i2.43008
Axelson, R.D., & Flick, A. (2011). Defining student engagement. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 43, 38-43.
Blythe, A. J. C., & Thompson, T. (2022). Virtual teaching in the COVID era: Providing surgical core trainee teaching via online webinars and videoconferencing. The Surgeon, 20(6), e405–e409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2022.03.007
Bowen, W. G., Chingos, M. M., Lack, K. A., & Nygren, T. I. (2014). Interactive learning online at public universities: Evidence from a six-campus randomized trial. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21728
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Brown, M., Hughes, H., Keppell, M., Hard, N., & Smith, L. (2015). Stories from students in their first semester of distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i4.1647
Bunga, B. N., Adu, A. A., Damayanti, Y., Takalapeta, T., Pello, S. C., & Kiling, I. Y. (2021). Synchronous vs. asynchronous: Photovoice study on Indonesian youth’s online learning experience. Child & Youth Services, 43(3), 276–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/0145935X.2021.1901572
Creswell J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Plano Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Qualitative Social Work, 12(4), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013493540a
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Developing publishable mixed methods manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 107–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298644
Dembereldorj, Z. (2021). Exploring online student engagement during COVID-19 pandemic in Mongolia. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(7), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v10n7p10
Dixson, M. D. (2010). Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging? Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 1–13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1744
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Fadde, P. J., and Vu, P. (2014). Blended online learning: Benefits, challenges, and misconceptions. In P. R. Lowenthal, C. S. York, & J. C. Richardson (Eds.), Online learning: Common misconceptions, benefits, and challenges (pp. 33–48). Nova Science Publishers.
Fahy, P. J. (2002). Use of linguistic qualifiers and intensifiers in a computer conference. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1601_2
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: A window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
Fauzi, M. A. (2022). E-learning in higher education institutions during COVID-19 pandemic: Current and future trends through bibliometric analysis. Heliyon, 8(5), e09433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09433
Febriana, I., & Simanjuntak, E. (2021). Self regulated learning dan stres akademik pada mahasiswa. Experientia: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 9(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33508/exp.v9i2
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Garg, A. (2020). Online education: A learner’s perspective during COVID-19. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 16(4), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/2319510X211013594
Ginting, R. O., & Ratnaningsih, I. Z. (2021). Hubungan antara work-study conflict dengan student engagement pada mahasiswa pekerja full-time di program studi S-1 Teknik Informatika Universitas Stikubank (UNISBANK) Semarang. (The relationship between work-study conflict and student engagement in full-time working students in the S-1 Informatics Engineering study program, University of Stikubank (UNISBANK) Semarang.) Jurnal Empati, 10(2), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.14710/empati.2021.30996
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.
Harris, L., Dargusch, J., Ames, K. & Bloomfield, C. (2022). Catering for “very different kids”: Distance education teachers’ understandings of and strategies for student engagement. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(8), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1735543
Henning, P. H. (2004). Everyday cognition and situated learning. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 143–168). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Herlina, N. (2021, December 15). Apresiasi Kemendikbudristek terhadap dosen dan institusi melalui SPADA Award 2021. Dikti Kemdikbud. (Ministry of Education and Culture appreciates lecturers and institutions through the 2021 SPADA Award. Dikti Kemdikbud.) http://www.dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/kabar-dikti/kabar/apresiasi-kemendikbudristek-terhadap-dosen-dan-institusi-melalui-spada-award-2021/
Hill, J. R., & Hannafin, M. J. (2001). Teaching and learning in digital environments: The resurgence of resource-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(3), 37–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30221121
Hollister, B., Nair, P., Hill-Lindsay, S., & Chukoskie, L. (2022) Engagement in online learning: Student attitudes and behavior during COVID-19. Frontiers in Education, 7, 851019. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.851019
Jeong, A. (2006). Gender interaction patterns and gender participation in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. The American Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2004_2
Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer.
Kemdikbud. (2013). Peraturan kementrian pendidikan dan kebudayaan No.109 tentang Penyelenggaraan pembelajaran jarak jauh di perguruan tinggi. (Ministry of Education and Culture Regulation No. 109 concerning Implementation of distance learning in tertiary institutions.) https://lldikti5.kemdikbud.go.id/
King, K. P. (2002). Identifying success in online teacher education and professional development. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00104-5
Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance actual student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 316–321. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.80.6.316-321
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604090
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24434165
Matuga, J. M. (2009). Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 4–11. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1287037464?accountid=27700
Mazzetti, G., Guglielmi, D., & Topa, G. (2020). Hard enough to manage my emotions: How hardiness moderates the relationship between emotional demands and exhaustion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1194. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01194
Miranda-Ackerman, R. C., Barbosa-Camacho, F. J., Sander-Möller, M. J., Buenrostro-Jiménez, A. D., Mares-País, R., Cortes-Flores, A. O., Morgan-Villela, G., Zuloaga-Fernández del Valle, C. J., Solano-Genesta, M., Fuentes-Orozco, C., Cervantes-Cardona, G. A., CervantesGuevara, G., & González-Ojeda, A.. (2019). Burnout syndrome prevalence during internship in public and private hospitals: A survey study in Mexico. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1593785. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1593785
Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity into Web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2), 31–39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428657
O'cathain, A., Murphy, E., & Nicholl, J. (2008). The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. Journal of health services research & policy, 13(2), 92-98. DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.00
Oh, Y., & Lee, S. M. (2016). The effects of online interactions on the relationship between learning-related anxiety and intention to persist among e-learning students with visual impairment. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i6.2581
Pamarthi, V., Grimm, L., Johnson, K., & Maxfield, C. (2019). Hybrid interactive and didactic teaching format improves resident retention and attention compared to traditional lectures. Academic Radiology, 26(9), 1269–1273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.02.018
Podsakoff, N. P., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Rachmaniar, R., Prihandini, P., & Anisa, R. (2021). Studi etnografi virtual tentang budaya mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan online di aplikasi Zoom. (Virtual ethnographic study of student culture in online lectures on the Zoom application.) Media Komunikasi FPIPS, 20(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.23887/mkfis.v20i2.33777
Radha, R., Mahalakshmi, K., Kumar, V. S., & Saravanakumar, A. R. (2020). E-learning during lockdown of COVID-19 pandemic: A global perspective. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(4), 1088–1099. http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJCA/article/view/26035
Rovai, A. P. (2002). A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v6i1.1871
Simanjuntak, E. (2015). Guiding questions method and extrinsic learning motivation of first year university students. ANIMA Indonesian Psychological Journal, 30(3), 148–154. https://doi.org/10.24123/aipj.v30i3.544
Simanjuntak, E. (2022). Self-regulated learning strategy training: Improving self-regulated learning of first year university students. Jurnal Sains Psikologi, 11(2), 95–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um023v11i22022p%25p
Stange, K. C., Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research. Annals of Family Medicine, 4(4), 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.615
Stone, C., & O’Shea, S. (2019). Older, online and first: Recommendations for retention and success. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3913
Thomson, D. L. (2010). Beyond the classroom walls: Teachers’ and students’ perspectives on how online learning can meet the needs of gifted students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(4), 662–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100405
Treglown, L., Palaiou, K., Zarola, A., & Furnham, A. (2016). The dark side of resilience and burnout: A moderation-mediation model. PloS one, 11(6), e0156279. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156279
Utami, A. U. (2021). Tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa pada pembelajaran daring mata kuliah fisika dasar. Jurnal Kiprah, 9(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v9i1.3219
Wheeler, S. (2002). Student perceptions of learning support in distance education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(4), 419–429. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/95256/
Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2010). Self-regulated learning and socio-cognitive theory. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 503–508). Elsevier Science.
Yu, J., Huang, C., Wang, X., & Tu, Y. (2020). Exploring the relationships among interaction, emotional engagement and learning persistence in online learning environments. International Symposium on Educational Technology (pp. 293–297). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET49818.2020.00070
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 311–328). Routledge.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
