Discrepancies and Similarities Between Online and Face-to-Face Teachers’ Use of Open Educational Resources (OER) for Teaching Purposes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7284Keywords:
open educational resources (OER), online teachers, face-to-face teachers, English as a foreign language, attitudesAbstract
The integration of open educational resources (OER) in the educational curricula of universities and educational organizations has gained tremendous popularity. However, there is a gap in research on teachers’ attitudes toward OER in many developing countries. Using a mixed-methods approach, this study explored the use of OER by online and face-to-face teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL) in Iran. A total of 62 teachers (31 online teachers and 31 face-to-face teachers) participated in the study. Survey and interview results indicated that there were significant differences between online and face-to-face teachers’ attitudes toward OER. Online teachers had a more positive attitude toward OER than face-to-face teachers. The perceived benefits of OER included developing the flexibility of curricula, encouraging personalized learning, and offering pedagogical options for teachers. There were several perceived OER-based challenges in the educational context of Iran as well. The challenges included teachers’ uncertainty about copyright issues, the low quality of OER, teachers’ low levels of digital literacy, teachers’ unawareness of the existence of OER, the lack of quality control over OER, the lack of credibility of OER content, and the lack of up-to-dateness of OER. There were also significant differences between participants’ perspectives on the types and frequency of using OER. More specifically, online teachers used OER for teaching practices more frequently than face-to-face teachers. Participants perceived that they needed various types of training for the appropriate use of OER. This study proposes several implications for renewing and improving teacher training/education programs and material development projects.
References
Butcher, N. (2015). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). UNESCO and Commonwealth of Learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000215804
Dixon, E. M., & Hondo, J. (2014). Re-purposing an OER for the online language course: A case study of Deutsch Interaktiv by the Deutsche Welle. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818559
Fadehan, O., & Okiki, O. (2023). Awareness, attitude and ethical concerns among faculty members in Nigerian universities on open educational resources (OERs). Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2023.2169122
Garrote Jurado, R., & Pettersson, T. (2015) Attitudes and utilization of open educational resources. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (ICERI2015), Spain. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:878290/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Georgiadou, E., & Kolaxizis, I. (2019). Film students’ attitude toward open educational resources (OERs) for film studies in Greece. Education Sciences, 9(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030195
Hussain, I., Chandio, J. H., & Sindher, R. H. K. (2013). A study on attitude of university academia towards the use of open educational resources in higher education. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences (PJCSS), 7(2), 367–380. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/188097
Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224
Kelly, H. (2014). A path analysis of educator perceptions of open educational resources using the technology acceptance model. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL), 15(2), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1715
Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222
Krelja Kurelovic, E. (2016). Advantages and limitations of usage of open educational resources in small countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 2(1), 136–142. https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/archive/5000123134-5000259500-1-PB.pdf
McGreal, R., Kinuthia, W., Marshall, S., & McNamara, T. (Eds.). (2013). Open educational resources: Innovation, research and practice. Commonwealth of Learning and Athabasca University. https://www.oerknowledgecloud.org/archive/pub_PS_OER-IRP_web.pdf
Mishra, S., & Singh, A. (2017). Higher education faculty attitude, motivation and perception of quality and barriers towards OER in India. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 425–458). African Minds, International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.602784
Moradi, S., & Abdi, S. (2021). Open educational resources: A review of functional experience in the world. Library and Information Science Research, 11(1), 258–280. http://doi.org/10.22067/infosci.2021.24109.0
Oates, L., Goger, L. K., Hashimi, J., & Farahmand, M. (2017). An early stage impact study of localised OER in Afghanistan. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 549–573). African Minds, International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.600441
Pérez-Paredes, P., Ordoñana Guillamón, C., & Aguado Jiménez, P. (2018). Language teachers’ perceptions on the use of OER language processing technologies in MALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(5-6), 522–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1418754
Reed, P. (2012). Awareness, attitudes and participation of teaching staff towards the open content movement in one university. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.18520
Rolfe, V. (2012). Open educational resources: Staff attitudes and awareness. Research in Learning Technology, 20. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v20i0.14395
Whyte, S., Schmid, E. C., van Hazebrouck Thompson, S., & Oberhofer, M. (2014). Open educational resources for CALL teacher education: The iTILT interactive whiteboard project. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(2), 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2013.818558
Wiley, D., Bliss, T. J., & McEwen, M. (2014). Open educational resources: A review of the literature. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 781–789). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_63
Wolfenden, F., Auckloo, P., Buckler, A., & Cullen, J. (2017). Teacher educators and OER in East Africa: Interrogating pedagogic change. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 251–286). African Minds, International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.600424
Zagdragchaa, B., & Trotter, H. (2017). Cultural-historical factors influencing OER adoption in Mongolia’s higher education sector. In C. Hodgkinson-Williams & P. B. Arinto (Eds.), Adoption and impact of OER in the Global South (pp. 389–424). African Minds, International Development Research Centre & Research on Open Educational Resources for Development. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1094856
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
