Addressing the Resource-Based View: Determinants That Drive Chinese Universities to Offer MOOCs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7468Keywords:
MOOCs, resource-based view, knowledge management, proximityAbstract
This study involved 51 Chinese universities from the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) World University Ranking 2021. With based the resource-based view (RBV) as a framework, it aimed to identify the determinants of human resource capital that were related to universities’ production of MOOCs. Three determinants were detected—size, lifelong learning, and proximity to the political centre. Both size and proximity to the political centre proved to be significant. The findings provide timely implications for university managers and suggest that the variety of management spaces be expanded to increase the portfolio of high-quality Chinese universities that facilitate the production of MOOCs. In addition, universities should increase their proximity awareness to remedy the disadvantages of uneven resource allocation due to geographical proximity.
References
Ahmad, I., Dar, M. A., Fenta, A., Halefom, A., Nega, H., Andualem, T. G., & Teshome, A. (2021). Spatial configuration of groundwater potential zones using OLS regression method. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 177, 104147. http://doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2021.104147
Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen, D. J., Jr. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700601
Barnová, S., & Krásna, S. (2018). Academic procrastination–One of the barriers in lifelong learning. R&E-SOURCE. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silvia-Barnova-2/publication/330345583_Academic_Procrastination_-_One_of_the_Barriers_in_Lifelong_Learning/links/5c3a12ed458515a4c720ce27/Academic-Procrastination-One-of-the-Barriers-in-Lifelong-Learning.pdf
Battisti, E., Nirino, N., Leonidou, E., & Thrassou, A. (2022). Corporate venture capital and CSR performance: An extended resource based view’s perspective. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1058–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.054
Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Brooks, R., & Everett, G. (2008). The impact of higher education on lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 27(3), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370802047759
Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (1999). Strategically managed buyer-supplier relationships and performance outcomes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(5), 497-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00007-8
Chatterton, P., & Goddard, J. (2000). The response of higher education institutions to regional needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4), 475–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-3435.00041
Chen, S., McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2015). Postdoctoral positions as preparation for desired careers: A narrative approach to understanding postdoctoral experience. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(6), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1024633
Christensen, P. H., & Pedersen, T. (2018). The dual influences of proximity on knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(8), 1782–1802. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2018-0211
Chuang, I., & Ho, A. (2016). HarvardX and MITx: Four years of open online courses (fall 2012 to summer 2016). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2889436
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
De Wit, H., & Altbach, P. G. (2021). Internationalization in higher education: Global trends and recommendations for its future. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 5(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2020.1820898
Funk, R. J. (2014). Making the most of where you are: Geography, networks, and innovation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 193–222. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43589253
Gallo, P. J., & Christensen, L. J. (2011). Firm size matters: An empirical investigation of organizational size and ownership on sustainability-related behaviors. Business & Society, 50(2), 315–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650311398784
Hair, J. J., Jr., Tatham, R. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. (2003). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Pearson.
Hong, Y., Hammad, A. W., & Akbarnezhad, A. (2019). Impact of organization size and project type on BIM adoption in the Chinese construction market. Construction Management and Economics, 37(11), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2019.1575515
Hörisch, J., Johnson, M. P., & Schaltegger, S. (2015). Implementation of sustainability management and company size: A knowledge‐based view. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 765–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1844
Howarth, J., D’Alessandro, S., Johnson, L., & White, L. (2022). Massive open online courses and consumer goals. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(3), 994–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12742
Huang, H. I., & Lee, C. F. (2012). Strategic management for competitive advantage: A case study of higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(6), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2012.727635
Jowett, G. S., & O’Donnell, V. (2014). Propaganda and persuasion examined. In Propaganda and persuasion (pp. 179–230). Sage.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Karim, M. S., Nahar, S., & Demirbag, M. (2022). Resource-based perspective on ICT use and firm performance: A meta-analysis investigating the moderating role of cross-country ICT development status. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121626
Kashki, A., Karami, M., Zandi, R., & Roki, Z. (2021). Evaluation of the effect of geographical parameters on the formation of the land surface temperature by applying OLS and GWR: A case study Shiraz City, Iran. Urban Climate, 37, 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100832
Khanra, S., Kaur, P., Joseph, R. P., Malik, A., & Dhir, A. (2022). A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1395–1413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2961
Kim, C. F., Pantzalis, C., & Park, J. C. (2012). Political geography and stock returns: The value and risk implications of proximity to political power. Journal of Financial Economics, 106(1), 196–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.007
Kumari, P. B., Singh, Y. K., Mandal, J., Shambhavi, S., Sadhu, S. K., Kumar, R., Ghosh, M., Raj, M., & Singh, M. (2021). Determination of safe limit for arsenic contaminated irrigation water using solubility free ion activity model (FIAM) and Tobit Regression Model. Chemosphere, 270, 128630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128630
Loukkola, T., Peterbauer, H., & Gover, A. (2020). Exploring higher education indicators. European University Association, 38(6), 1278–1300. https://www.modip.uoc.gr/sites/default/files/files/2020%20EUA_Exploring%20HE%20Indicators.pdf
Lowry, R. C. (2004). Markets, governance, and university priorities: Evidence on undergraduate education and research. Economics of Governance, 5(1), 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-002-0056-9
Martínez, T. L. (2013). La actividad investigadora de la universidad española en la primera década del siglo XXI: la importancia del tamaño de la Universidad [The research activity of Spanish universities in the first decade of the 21st century: the importance of university size]. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 36(4), 36–15. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2013.4.1046
McCorkle, L. S., Vestal, A., & Diamond, L. L. (2023). Preparing doctoral students in special education: What do we really know? Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(3), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064221134815
Moreno-Marcos, P. M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., & Kloos, C. D. (2018). Prediction in MOOCs: A review and future research directions. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(3), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2856808
Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2005). Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. International Journal of Testing, 5(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4
Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Vallanti, G. (2013). Does government funding complement or substitute private research funding to universities? Research Policy, 42(1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.010
Ogunsanya, O. A., Aigbavboa, C. O., Thwala, D. W., & Edwards, D. J. (2019). Barriers to sustainable procurement in the Nigerian construction industry: An exploratory factor analysis. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(5),1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1658697
Ospina-Delgado, J. E., Zorio-Grima, A., & García-Benau, M. A. (2016). Massive open online courses in higher education: A data analysis of the MOOC supply. Intangible Capital, 12(5), 1401–1450. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.798
Rothschild, M., & White, L. J. (1991). The university in the marketplace: Some insights and some puzzles (NBER Working Paper No. w3853). https://ssrn.com/abstract=473983
Sanders, J. S., & Wong, T. (2021). International partner selection among higher education institutions in Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan: A resource-based view. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 43(2), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2020.1774097
Sav, G. T. (2013). Four-stage DEA efficiency evaluations: Financial reforms in public university funding. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 5(1), 24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v5n1p24
Scaffidi, A. K., & Berman, J. E. (2011). A positive postdoctoral experience is related to quality supervision and career mentoring, collaborations, networking and a nurturing research environment. Higher Education, 62(6), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9407-1
Schlesselman, L., & Coleman, C. I. (2013). College and school of pharmacy characteristics associated with US News and World Report rankings. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(3). https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe77355
Schlup, Y., & Brunner, T. (2018). Prospects for insects as food in Switzerland: A Tobit regression. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.010
Tang, H., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2016). Massive open online courses and educational equality in China: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 9(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0901.04
Taşçı, G., & Titrek, O. (2019). Evaluation of lifelong learning centers in higher education: A sustainable leadership perspective. Sustainability, 12(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010022
Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 26(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382
Valaei, N., Rezaei, S., Bressolles, G., & Dent, M. M. (2022). Indispensable components of creativity, innovation, and FMCG companies’ competitive performance: A resource-based view (RBV) of the firm. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-11-2020-0420
Wang, K. (2023). The perception and behavioral intention toward MOOCs: Undergraduates in China. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 24(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v24i1.6677
Wang, K., van Hemmen, S. F., & Criado, J. R. (2022). The behavioural intention to use MOOCs by undergraduate students: Incorporating TAM with TPB. International Journal of Educational Management, 36(7), 1321–1342. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2021-0446
Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship: Conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00427.x
Wernerfelt, B. (1989). From critical resources to corporate strategy. Journal of General Management, 14(3), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630708901400301
Williams, S. D. (2014). A strategic resource-based view of higher education institutions’ resources. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(12). https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=0232ba7c2d67ce04cb86b9c833ccad2115884bd7
Worthington, A. C., & Higgs, H. (2011). Economies of scale and scope in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 61(4), 387–414. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41477803
Zakharova, U. S. (2019). Online course production and university internationalization: Correlation analysis. In European MOOCs Stakeholders Summit (pp. 102–107). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19875-6_12
Zheng, Q., Chen, L., & Burgos, D. (2018). The development of MOOCs in China. Springer.
Zheng, Y., & Yang, R. Y. (2017). The rise of MOOCs: The literature review of research progress and hot spots of MOOCs education in mainland China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(9), 6165–6174. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01056a
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
