Navigating the Learning Landscape: Social Cognition and Task-Technology Fit as Predictors for MOOCs Continuance Intention by Sales Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i1.7567Keywords:
self-directed learning, MOOC, sales professional, social cognition theory, self-development, social recognition, task-technology fit, continued intentionsAbstract
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have gained popularity among sales professionals who use them for self-directed learning and upskilling. However, research related to their intentions to continue learning is scarce. Drawing from the social cognition theory, this research aimed to address this gap by investigating the role of task-technology fit, self-development, and social recognition in sales professionals’ continued use of MOOCs. The study hinged on empirical research and used a survey to collect data from 366 sales professionals. The results suggest that task-technology fit, self-development, and social recognition play a significant role in sales professionals’ continued use of MOOCs. The study has practical implications for organizations promoting employee learning and development. The findings provide valuable information for MOOC designers and providers to develop more effective courses that meet the needs of sales professionals.
References
Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). Massive open online course (MOOCs) acceptance: The role of task-technology fit (TTF) for higher education sustainability. Sustainability, 13(13), Article 7374. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137374
Artis, A. B., & Harris, E. G. (2007). Self-Directed learning and sales force performance: An integrated framework. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 27(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134270101
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351¬–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676–713. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.676
Cagiltay, N. E., Cagiltay, K., & Celik, B. (2020). An analysis of course characteristics, learner characteristics, and certification rates in MITx MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4698
Castaño-Muñoz, J., Kalz, M., Kreijns, K., & Punie, Y. (2018). Who is taking MOOCs for teachers’ professional development on the use of ICT? A cross-sectional study from Spain. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(5), 607–624.
Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014
Conde, R., Prybutok, V., & Sumlin, C. (2021). The utilization of online sales forums by salespeople as a mesosystem for enhancing sales-activity knowledge. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(4), 630–640. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-03-2020-0129
Cooper, C. L., & Lu, L. (2016). Presenteeism as a global phenomenon: Unraveling the psychosocial mechanisms from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-09-2015-0106
Daneji, A. A., Ayub, A. F. M., & Khambari, M. N. M. (2019). The effects of perceived usefulness, confirmation and satisfaction on continuance intention in using massive open online course (MOOC). Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 11(2), 201–214.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Filieri, R., Acikgoz, F., Ndou, V., & Dwivedi, Y. (2021). Is TripAdvisor still relevant? The influence of review credibility, review usefulness, and ease of use on consumers’ continuance intention. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(1), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2020-0402
Fowler, F. J., Jr. (2002). Survey research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
Greenhow, C., & Lewin, C. (2016). Social media and education: Reconceptualizing the boundaries of formal and informal learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2015.1064954
Griffiths, M. A., Goodyear, V. A., & Armour, K. M. (2022). Massive open online courses (MOOCs) for professional development: Meeting the needs and expectations of physical education teachers and youth sport coaches. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 27(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2021.1874901
Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Helm, R., Möller, M., Mauroner, O., & Conrad, D. (2013). The effects of a lack of social recognition on online communication behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 1065–1077.
Homburg, C., Workman, J. P., Jr., & Jensen, O. (2002). A configurational perspective on key account management. Journal of Marketing, 66(2), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.2.38.18471
Hosen, M., Ogbeibu, S., Giridharan, B., Cham, T.-H., Lim, W. M., & Paul, J. (2021). Individual motivation and social media influence on student knowledge sharing and learning performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Computers & Education, 172, Article 104262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104262
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Huang, G., & Ren, Y. (2020). Linking technological functions of fitness mobile apps with continuance usage among Chinese users: Moderating role of exercise self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.013
Hunter, G. K., & Perreault, W. D., Jr. (2006). Sales technology orientation, information effectiveness, and sales performance. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(2), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134260201
Itani, O. S., Agnihotri, R., & Dingus, R. (2017). Social media use in B2B sales and its impact on competitive intelligence collection and adaptive selling: Examining the role of learning orientation as an enabler. Industrial Marketing Management, 66, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.012
Khashan, M. A., Elsotouhy, M. M., Alasker, T. H., & Ghonim, M. A. (2023). Investigating retailing customers’ adoption of augmented reality apps: Integrating the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2) and task-technology fit (TTF). Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 41(5), 613–629.
Kim, D., Jung, E., Yoon, M., Chang, Y., Park, S., Kim, D., & Demir, F. (2021). Exploring the structural relationships between course design factors, learner commitment, self-directed learning, and intentions for further learning in a self-paced MOOC. Computers & Education, 166, Article 104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104171
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Association Press.
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., III, Swanson, R. A., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612
Koukis, N., & Jimoyiannis, A. (2019). MOOCS for teacher professional development: Exploring teachers’ perceptions and achievements. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-10-2018-0081
Kuo, T. M., Tsai, C.-C., & Wang, J.-C. (2021). Linking web-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: The role of online academic hardiness. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, Article 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100819
Lassk, F. G., Ingram, T. N., Kraus, F., & Di Mascio, R. (2012). The future of sales training: Challenges and related research questions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 32(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.2753/PSS0885-3134320112
Liu, Y., Zhang, M., Qi, D., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Understanding the role of learner engagement in determining MOOCs satisfaction: A self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 6084–6098. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2028853
Martin, C. A., Rivera, D. E., Riley, W. T., Hekler, E. B., Buman, M. P., Adams, M. A., & King, A. C. (2014). A dynamical systems model of social cognitive theory. In D. Tilbury (Chair), 2014 American Control Conference (pp. 2407–2412). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2014.6859463
Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Why study on a MOOC? The motives of students and professionals. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.3033
Mısır, H., & Işık-Güler, H. (2022). “Be a better version of you!”: A corpus-driven critical discourse analysis of MOOC platforms’ marketing communication. Linguistics and Education, 69, Article 101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101021
Moghavvemi, S., Paramanathan, T., Rahin, N. M., & Sharabati, M. (2017). Student’s perceptions towards using e-learning via Facebook. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(10), 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1347201
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21278
Olsson, U. (2016). Open courses and MOOCs as professional development – is the openness a hindrance? Education + Training, 58(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-01-2015-0006
Park, S., Jeong, S., & Ju, B. (2018). Employee learning and development in virtual HRD: Focusing on MOOCs in the workplace. Industrial and Commercial Training, 50(5), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-03-2018-0030
Radford, A. W., Robles, J., Cataylo, S., Horn, L., Thornton, J., & Whitfield, K. E. (2014). The employer potential of MOOCs: A mixed-methods study of human resource professionals’ thinking on MOOCs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1842
Rahi, S., Khan, M. M., & Alghizzawi, M. (2021). Factors influencing the adoption of telemedicine health services during COVID-19 pandemic crisis: An integrative research model. Enterprise Information Systems, 15(6), 769–793.
Rollins, M., Nickell, D., & Wei, J. (2014). Understanding salespeople’s learning experiences through blogging: A social learning approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(6), 1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.05.019
Sablina, S., Kapliy, N., Trusevich, A., & Kostikova, S. (2018). How MOOC-Takers estimate learning success: Retrospective reflection of perceived benefits. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3768
Shao, Z. (2018). Examining the impact mechanism of social psychological motivations on individuals’ continuance intention of MOOCs. Internet Research, 28(1), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-11-2016-0335
Shapiro, H. B., Lee, C. H., Roth, N. E. W., Li, K., Çetinkaya-Rundel, M., & Canelas, D. A. (2017). Understanding the massive open online course (MOOC) student experience: An examination of attitudes, motivations, and barriers. Computers & Education, 110, 35–50.
Shon, M., Lee, D., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Are global over-the-top platforms the destroyers of ecosystems or the catalysts of innovation? Telematics and Informatics, 60, Article 101581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101581
Singh, A., & Sharma, A. (2021). Acceptance of MOOCs as an alternative for internship for management students during COVID-19 pandemic: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1231–1244. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2021-0085
Spreng, R. A., Harrell, G. D., & Mackoy, R. D. (1995). Service recovery: Impact on satisfaction and intentions. Journal of Services Marketing, 9(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876049510079853
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
Tseng, T. H., Lin, S., Wang, Y.-S., & Liu, H.-X. (2022). Investigating teachers’ adoption of MOOCs: The perspective of UTAUT2. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 635–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674888
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wan, L., Xie, S., & Shu, A. (2020). Toward an Understanding of University Students’ Continued Intention to Use MOOCs: When UTAUT Model Meets TTF Model. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941858
Wang, H., Tao, D., Yu, N., & Qu, X. (2020). Understanding consumer acceptance of healthcare wearable devices: An integrated model of UTAUT and TTF. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 139, Article 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104156
Wang, S.-L., & Wu, P.-Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004
Wu, B., & Chen, X. (2017). Continuance intention to use MOOCs: Integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM) and task technology fit (TTF) model. Computers in Human Behavior, 67, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.028
Yan, M., Filieri, R., Raguseo, E., & Gorton, M. (2021). Mobile apps for healthy living: Factors influencing continuance intention for health apps. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, Article 120644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120644
Zhang, Y., Tian, Y., Yao, L., Duan, C., Sun, X., & Niu, G. (2022). Individual differences matter in the effect of teaching presence on perceived learning: From the social cognitive perspective of self-regulated learning. Computers & Education, 179, Article 104427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104427
Zhou, M. (2016). Chinese university students’ acceptance of MOOCs: A self-determination perspective. Computers & Education, 92, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.012
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. The copyright of all content published in IRRODL is retained by the authors.
This copyright agreement and use license ensures, among other things, that an article will be as widely distributed as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific and/or scholarly archive.
You are free to
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms below:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
